US Entry Waiver For Sex Assault Related Convictions

K Scottposted 3 years ago

I just got word from a client that we obtained from here. He had a sex-related offence from many years ago and I was just informed that his approved waiver came in the mail. He posted here about a year and a half ago and he just told me that he got his waiver approved.

So do not believe when the Discount Waiver Companies tell you that sex assault convictions will not be approved under the Trump administration. This individual is extremely happy and is an Ontario resident. This is the same client that was also mentioned yesterday in another thread by the agent of a Discount Waiver Company. It took a very long time and indeed was a major effort to get approved.

Sex Assault convictions can get approved under this administration if you know what you are doing. You will not get this same level of service if you are only paying $499 plus tax on a complex waiver since this is a car payment for some people. So yes contact the professionals when you need to resolve your border crossing issues. It is even better if you are in BC since we can have you come to our Surrey, Burnaby or Vancouver location and meet one of our staff members.
We specialize in resolving complex USA border crossing issues as well as visas and other services.

www.usentrywaiverservices.com
Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
1 888 908-3841
604 332-9213

Replies (recent first):

@John Of course you will say this Sport. What else could you actually say since your nose has literally been caught in the rubbish bin looking for bones?

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #59

@Ken.

Yes. We all believe you.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #58

Yours words are now meaningless Sport since you have already admitted to the deception regarding being "accredited." lol Your credability has vanished quicker than your smelly runners. lol Again, you will never know our locations since you are not entitled to possess such info Sport. SO, stop asking since I have already told you that I have no interest in you. Hence, stop trying to come over to see me. You are really starting to embarrass yourself here with your desperation. 😭

Hey what was that again about your "accreditation" again? 😭 Hey Sport have you ever noticed that I have never asked you about your location or tried to find a way to see you? This is bcause I DO NOT CARE about you Sport. 😭 Man its weird because I have never had a guy have this much interest in me. Kinda strange..lol

ANyway, I gotta get back to our MANY clientele since we are now experiencing a major uptick in work again. We also have to raise our rates soon as well Sport.😭

Oh and Sport...we recently got 12 fairly major sex crime related and other type cases from people that saw it on this forum. I cannot thank you enough since your lack of Sorna experience(and knowledge in general) sealed the deal for us. Again, Sport, thank you from the bottom of my heart. :)

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #57

@Ken

Pardon and Waiver Experts/On the Spot Fingerprinting is an accredited RCMP fingerprint location. All three people are accredited. Vetted. Pardons. Waivers. Fingerprints. Passport Photos. Many revenue streams.

Your "company" is a mailbox in BC. No office. Just you. In a small apartment in England I am beginning to suspect you share with a few people. Your asking people in Canada to send money, hoping a guy who used to live temporarily in Canada will do what he promises. Your even trying to start a subscription "credit repair" business.

See the difference?

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #56

John....you say you have 2(so big deal) but I have some of your former clients/people that have spoken to you on the phone and came to your shack...so what is the point? Sure thanks for the bode of confidence but we really do not need validation from a Discount Waiver Company(no offence intended). You keep talking about scam but the real scam is claiming accrediation when your name is not on the accrediation letters. Hence no accrediation. smh.

Like I said...what does accrediation have to do with anything when you refuse to answer technical and advanced technical questions on these waiver cases?

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #55

@Ken.

You do waivers. Period. You get the same % of September Letters as anyone else. This is your "scam", they thought that "maybe this guy will get me a September Letter. I have 2 of your past clients who were both told this and got...waivers. Let me clarify. You do not do a bad job. You do a better job that the average place. Unfortunately, instead of simply being honest about it, you surround the fact you do a decent waiver with a bunch of deceptive information.

Its not necessary. You could make a decent living just being honest, because you do understand how to do a decent waiver.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #54

Dear forum members:

Now you see why I preach the evils of using these cheap $699 Waiver Companies. This is what you are going to be dealing with after you waste your money. Uneducated individuals that have no idea what they are doing. This is the typical DWC and you will truly get what you pay for. I do not even need to do much here since this moronic imbecile is making my case for me. 😎

This makes providing relevant info to you guys extremely difficult and has rendered this forum impotent. Like a certain individual in Ontario that I know. Anyway, I cannot express my appreciation for the members that have contact us. Some have only contacted us for free info, and I am fine with this. Our goal has always been to provide you guys with help on your waiver cases.

This is also why we limit what we put on a public forum since the Ontario Discount Waiver Companies are always circling like rats. Remember, we are the only ones in the industry that specialize in and can obtain the September Letters aka lifetime clearances on Certain cases. 👍

Anyway, lets keep up the good work and let the insignificant trolls stay under the bridge where they truly belong. 👺

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
888 908-3841
604 332-9213
info@deniedentrytousa.com

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #53

@Ken. You own your business. Its consists of a mailbox in BC, and your tiny crammed UK apartment. Where do you keep all the cars you claim to have? Not a single picture? Not a single picture of your flying helicopters? Weird. Its almost like...you made it all up.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #52

Well Sport at least you were nice enough to admit that we have the knowledge. However, you really are getting worried about our success. 😉 So, Sport I have a question about the people that visit us at our B.C. locations. So, people that come to the Surrey BC office think that they are in England? Yet the shell station and Gurdwara on Scott Rd at about 68th is close to us.

Sport, you are really desperate to know our locations...lol 😉 So yeah, I guess the people coming in paying Canadian dollars, do not realize that they are in England….right…Sport you keep proving yourself more stupid that I can even realize. 🤦

Also, get your name on Jennifer’s accreditation letters. Too bad that you do not own the business….Sport. 😉

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #51

Buy Canadian everyone. There are a lot of people who are providing high quality service in Canada. You do not need to pay Ken in the UK, who is not truthful, or transparent. Ken has knowledge but cannot keep his lies straight. Avoid at all costs.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #50

@ John Woah little neutered male...did I hit some sore spots? It took you long enough to reply but guess your "condition" just kicked in again. I just asked a few questions, and you get your lingerie in a twist. 😂 Yeah you got it right when you say keep it short since all you 5'3" males eventually use these words. John, my administrator is taller than you 😂

Anyway, thanks for being honest about your lack of knowledge about Sex Assault cases. So now you admit that you have no knowledge regarding the SORNA charts. You finally admit that you have not seen every waiver application. So, the question still remains…Why did you not offer Mr. Points any technical info on his case? 🤔 Just admit that you do not know what you are doing with these cases. J.R. you are definitely a certified loser..lol

Plus, why are you lying on Michelle now? She does not want to be dragged into your Grade 2 playpen. 50-60 is maybe your I. Q at the very most...lol Ok Sport, we both know that you have no real friends, but you are right when you say that we are “universally disliked.” Except the part that you forgot to mention that this jealousy is from competitors only…Sport. 😉

Again, sorry Sport but it is not my job to educate you on how to get sex assault cases cleared. You would know if you got the proper training on how to do these cases Sport. You are also singing my song when you try to clown on our locations. Yeah, I get it that you do not have the resources as we do. I get it Sport!!! I understand that you have a Fetish for England. I get it Sport!! I understand the jealousy but stand in line like everyone else. So again Sport…why is your name not on the “accreditation letters” for Jennifer’s business Sport? Why is it that you despise the short girl that walked out after you tried to make a quick dollar store sale Sport? 😂

Again, instead of dreaming about me, why do you not get the proper education, and you might prosper Sport!! This is how you can tell when an effeminate man has nothing better to do that keep focusing on the big dogs. Anyway Sport, you often dodge the hard questions that I pose to you on this forum. It is fine since I know that you cannot answer them.

Remember Sport, at least try to provide some technical info to help with these cases. Although, I understand that it is beyond your level of comprehension….Sport! 👍

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #49

@Ken. I'll keep this short. Because I am busy with actual clients, where you have basically none at this point.

-I don't need to see the Sorna sheet, the rejection letter is clear and mentions even more detail.
-The Sorna sheet is irrelevant when they were obviously directed to say no no matter what
-I don't see EVERY application. But all of mine, 50 or 60 NOT mine a week, plus A colleague in Montreal and Michelle in Regina. Remind me of what YOUR circle is, since your universally disliked and not even in Canada?
-As I said, I assume this will change under Biden. I just want to see proof so people have some assurance they have a fighting chance.

The reason no one likes you is because of this nonsense. You lie about your credentials, and you lie about your results. This is why despite your claims you are reduced to a mailbox in Canada and a tiny apartment in England. Turn over a new leaf, and you could thrive in this business. Just be honest, and transparent.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #48

Well Sport, it is not my fault that you do not have the education, resources, or training on how to effectively prepare and comprehend these cases. There is nothing magical about this process, and this clearly reflects upon your lack of expertise. I am also not the only person that has successfully cleared these cases. I will admit that they can indeed get complex, and it is made worse with a prior waiver denial. I suspect that Mr. Points is an adult male over the age of 19. He is clearly capable of making his own decisions regarding whatever he chooses to do in life.

Again, you should not get upset that you are unable to get these cases cleared. You were not even aware of the SORNA charts until I mentioned them here. You were unaware of the existence of the sex assault panels that the ARO uses in these cases. I provided actual documented evidence of the existence of this information in our video. I was the only one to point out specifics on his denial letter.

So why did you not do the same for him Sport? Why did you not offer any technical specs/guidance regarding his case? Why did you simply just throw your hands in the air and just foolishly say that absolutely no waivers whatsoever have ever been granted on sex assault cases during the Trump era? Essentially, you are saying that you have seen every single sex assault waiver application from every single waiver provider that has been sent to the ARO, and none were approved under Trump. This also indicates that you have seen every single case from every single lawyer & discount Waiver Company in all of North America. Now, I am not even going to say how your statement makes you look..lol

Again, if you should refrain from making such moronic statements unless you have access to every single sex assault waiver case that has ever been filed under the Trump administration. Mr. Points will definitely be facing an uphill battle in his case. However, it can be done if he is interested in making the professional investment since it will not be $699.

You just reminded me of something that was reported to me by a client on Wednesday. This gentleman was tricked into paying for a waiver application that he did not need. His offences do not require a US Entry Waiver but the Ontario Discount Waiver Company pushed him into making a sale. I told him that he was ripped off and should get a refund. He called them and had me on the phone. They initially tried to BS him but then I spoke up. It ended up being an argument between me and the company. Ironically, they immediately knew all about us as soon as I mentioned my name.

Anyway, the point is that we are working to try and get him a partial refund. I want to thank you again since I could not have made this statement without sounding like a braggart. You opened up the door for me and allowed me to make this statement when you stated “I just want to point out that Michelle and I don't make money from discouraging applications.” Well sir I am not going to let you off the hook with this statement since this is a cop-out. It is not always about making money Sport. You have a civic duty of care to ensure that things are always done in the client’s best interest. Hence, financial gain is irrelevant since the good of the client should always be of paramount importance.

Besides...you are being a bit hypocritical because you make this statement but yet you previously threw dollar store prices at Mr. Points in this thread. So one minute it is about making money and then the next it is not. Please make up your mind sir.

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration law Intelligence Analyst
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
888 908-3841
604 332-9213
info@deniedentrytousa.com

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #47

I just want to point out that Michelle and I don't make money from "discouraging" applications. Under Trump, I have pointed out that Sexual Assault cases were not being granted because I am trying to provide truthful and accurate information. Michelle is the same. Being honest is INTEGRAL to our businesses.

Ken has stated the opposite. I will let you draw your own conclusions, but does anyone REALLY think Ken is magically getting waivers granted, while Michelle and I, are not?

Anyone can promise ANYTHING. The truth is under Joe Biden we are all HOPING things will get better, and as a matter of fact, I am optimistic about this.

But there is a difference between saying "oh ya! I do a ton of these" and ACTUAL PROOF.

The problem with people who have waivers that are challenging, is they WANT to believe that a hail mary will work.

I deal in facts. I used to see 50-60 people a WEEK at the airport, PLUS my clients, and I had clients that had sexual assault convictions that had 5 year waivers in the past. All rejected.

Isn't it RIDICULOUS to think that Homeland Security is giving waivers to ONE guys waivers, and rejecting the rest of the country?

Sometimes the truth is VERY simple. I don't believe in miracles. I believe in facts. I will change my stance when I see an ACTUAL example of a waiver being granted for sexual assault.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #46

@Points, I am surprised that Customs even took the information from your ex. I had 2 cases here were ex's tried causing problems with my client's waivers - they first called me and started bothering me - I told them to get lost. - they were not my clients and I was going to charge them with Harassment. I understand they called Customs at Regway - and the officer told them they could not take their word for anything and they do not make the decisions regarding a waiver. So nothing happened and clients both got their waivers - no problems. This is what this forum is all about - every case is so unique.

MIchelle replied 3 years ago   #45

@points Waiting out the 25 years will help but there are still other things that will have to be documented in order for you to be deemed rehabilitated. I assume that perhaps you were a Tier 1, but some info was provided to CBP that placed you into tier 2? You have an extremely sensitive case that will have to be handled in a certain way in order for it to get approved. It is difficult analyzing your case without seeing your case particulars.

You also raised a point about the ex-girlfriend. I always tell my boys to never tell their girlfriends anything about their past since these women tend to do this to former partners. Hell, I tell them to not even have a girlfriend but that ids another topic for an internet talk radio show episode. Anyway, I believe that perhaps she ratted you out and the border pulled you into secondary? Then they likely took a sworn statement from you, and then used statement against you.

There are some other things that will help your case, but I do not want to put them on this forum. This is because we would have to ask certain questions, and your answers are better stated in person or the privacy of a phone call.

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
888 908-3841
604 332-9213
info@deniedentrytousa.com

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #44

@Points, okay, thank for info. Unfortunately, I would not be able to offer any more assistance to you. I believe that your chances of getting a waiver are very low, however, maybe Ken or John can review your paperwork, and provide more of a guarantee that you will get a waiver. I have a few cases that I am working on, simply because I was in a contract with a trucking company, when I started them, and I am keeping my word that I would help them obtain a waiver. We are doing the 2nd applications and hopefully, we will see better results. If we actually receive waivers (I don't think we will), but if we do, I will keep you posted. Thanks!!!

[ Michelle appended this reply on February 18, 2021 @ 9:41 am ]

Edit: I do not believe the time line will help you. They used this as an excuse in the denial letter in one of the cases I am involved with. The letter stated that not enough time had passed. At the time, had been 20 years since incident and they said 25 years as a minimum. We tried again at the 26 year mark, and was denied again. So I am not certain that is the right answer for you..

[ Michelle appended this reply on February 18, 2021 @ 5:16 pm ]

Edit #2, my response regarding timeline / time frame is based on my experience only. I sincerely hope that the Biden Administration will make it easier to receive a waiver with certain offenses such as these with the right amount of time and rehabilitation.

Michelle replied 3 years ago   #43

@Michelle
Hi Michelle, I already received a pardon. Did not help in the waiver process.
Only reason the CBP found out of my prior conviction is due an ex girlfriend calling the border. I was designated a tier two offender on the denial letter. I have heard that I should wait until that timeframe elapses in order to reapply.

Points replied 3 years ago   #42

@ John Ok, SPORT, ya gotta stop giving me compliments since that is actually one of my narcissistic weaknesses...lol. It is similar to the Borg become weak when they cannot adapt to rotating shield frequencies. I also think I am lost since I do not remember seeing the name Ambassador anywhere. I will say that I thank you for the other compliments. I will also say that you provide me with a degree of entertainment, and free assistance with my projects. You also understand that wehave multiple projects on the go and my time here can be sporatic.

K SCOTT replied 3 years ago   #41

@Ken In this case, you are right. You were "busy with other things" when "Ambassador" suddenly appeared and said conflicting information. He said at first he had done multiple applications, then changed it to "won on appeal". 7 years the application took apparently he claimed. He appeared because I had put of a post warning people they would not get a sexually based waiver from Trump. He also couldn't tell us what was on the waiver, or show us a pic, or anything. Then he disappeared, said it was with "Millar and Hayes" and poof...suddenly Ken was back. Almost as if....you were the same people.

You then claimed to be doing them successfully the whole time. Of course, without proof. Because you have done this in the past, opened multiple accounts, I assumed you were Ambassador. Anyways that was in the fall when your company closed.

J Rogers replied 3 years ago   #40

Reply to this thread

There is no need to “register”, just enter the same name + password of your choice every time.

Pro tip: Use to add links, quotes and more.