Its one of Ken Scotts buddies. The one who pretends to be a "lifer" when he had his radio show. He does have a real criminal record, but my understanding is its "voyeurism" and he just had probation. He poses as some "ex gang guy" to pretend Ken Scott got him a waiver. One of the people from the forum texted me to explain who it is. Ken is very upset at my posts that point out his shortcomings, so his friend has decided to try and "wreck" the forum so no one uses it.

Ken, this isn't helping you.

Is everyone in agreement this guy needs to be banned? His number simply comes up:

Provider: Cellco Partnership DBA Verizon Wireless
Usage: Unknown
Country: US

So its an American number, but he doesn't pick up.

Suggestions if he doesn't leave? I don't want to restrict someone, but he is wasting everyone's time, and creating multiple identities.

@J Rogers or what? What u gonna do nothing shut up lol

You have no info tog ice you jsut do guesses u cock sucker

[ Dumb fuck of theyear appended this reply on January 21, 2026 @ 4:42 pm ]

U just do guess

@J Rogers shut up ur not a lawyer u goofball u just accused me of being some random bald dude THIS GUYS NOT A LAWYER WHAT EVER HE SAYS MEANS NOTHING AHIS WIFE WORKS A FINGEPRINTING SPOT HES a wanna be lawyer he got mad called me some random guys name after lol I told him call me now he’s being a pussy again THIS GUYS A MORON I have his pic he’s 5’7

@Dumb fuck of theyear

Can you please let people get their information without you wasting our time? People NEED this information, and your making it harder for them.

You can email me here pardonguy2@gmail.com but leave the forum for serious people.

@J Rogers give me a call 586-223-4102 u can see exactly who I am I’m not hiding you pussy lol

@J Rogers your a moron lol I searched up who that is you think I’m some random black bald guy lol just cus I found out your not a lawyer what a dinbwit of a person hey everybody anything this moron says means nothing he’s a loser in this field lol

@Jack tripper 18769

You are also Jack Tripper 187 and Jack Tripper 185.

aka Ken Scott. Now that no one trusts you, what are you even doing for a living? I know you have no formal education, so I am curious what the back-up plan was when your "deception" doesn't work. Waivers are tough right now. Far less clients, and you don;t even have an office. Start from scratch, compete on the West Coast with AllCleared who are expensive and LAZY. But you prefer shortcuts, deception and making up fake qualifications. Why?

@J Rogers ladies and gents there you have it guys. Idiot he’s not a lawyer lol

@J Rogers ur a moron lol I don’t even kno who that is hahaha

[ Jack tripper 18769 appended this reply on January 21, 2026 @ 1:33 pm ]

Got exposed then calls me a random guy lol

@Jack tripper 18769

I give free advice. I am NOT a lawyer, and I have REPEATED that many times. I also know more about waivers than ANY lawyer you will find. I get calls from lawyers all the time for advice. Ken Scott is behind this.

You are obviously a fake, trying to start trouble. We run a business where we do Pardons, Waivers, Fingerprints and even Passport Photos. And I can tell who you are now. You are Ken Scott. Here is how dumb Ken Scott is everyone. He tried to tell me he had "partnered" with "On the Spot Fingerprinting" and therefore I had better "watch out". Suddenly, he announced, he had a "strategic partner, right in my "same area". I had to embarrass him and explain, that was owned by US. Same Office. He was so sloppy, he didn't even check the address. Pardon and Waiver Experts/On the Spot Fingerprinting.

Notice, Ken Scott pops up every few months, NEVER posts at normal times, because he is in Surrey United Kingdom. Not Surrey BC like he pretends. He does KNOW waivers, but pretends he "was" some sort of intelligence analyst. But he is actually a scam artist. He also refuses to use eSAFE, I assume because he refuses to learn how to use it. He is also the person trying to cast doubt on my timelines.

Thank you for wasting everyone's time. At least we know why you don't understand "common sense".

@J Rogers I heard your not a lawyer your wife runs a fingerprint business your 5’6 angry and short come up short in life no pun attended and your a multitudes consultant who gives you the right

[ Jack tripper 18769 appended this reply on January 21, 2026 @ 12:43 pm ]

You know your wife Jennifer that’s works at the finger print spot and your a utilities guy

@J Rogers correct best reply you’ve given yet straight forward to the point

[ Jack tripper 18769 appended this reply on January 21, 2026 @ 12:25 pm ]

I also heard you troll online and your wife owns a fingerprint company and your not a lawyer I dead my research on you lol

@Jack tripper 187

You said you "had been waiting 367 days". So I said "maybe they are going to deny you"

But it turns out, you were wrong. You are going to be 367 days on February 10th. Is it February 10th? NO.

Therefore, on February 10th, my advice stands, but as you stated, its a simple waiver. Therefore, I am 90% sure you will have it before February 10th.

I think you would agree, bad information makes it hard to give accurate information. Now please, BEFORE you reply, READ the thread.

@J Rogers makes no sense u just said I was about to get denied now your saying something else

@Jack tripper 185

"It clearly says 12 months". They are not taking 12 months, they are taking about 11 months for FIRST TIME APPLICANTS ONLY. Re-applications are taking 92 days as of the last waiver i posted. So the website is wrong in BOTH counts. Its been saying "12 months" since April 2024. Even when it was 14-15 months.

I am posting ACTUAL data, not "what the website says" that is going to have said the same thing for the last 20 months. Obviously its inaccurate.

If the website hasn't been changed in over a year, that's a pretty good indication that is is a "guestimate" that isn't being updated.

@Jack tripper 185

If its February 8, why are you claiming its 367 days? I CLEARLY said they are doing February's right now, and your claiming 367 days as of yesterday, which is completely inaccurate.

February 10 would be 367 days. I am posting ACCURATE information, but I can't advise people who are inaccurate.

Just hold on, you will get an answer soon, and try to be accurate please. Other people are reading this thinking you are giving accurate information.

@J Rogers doubt it’s a denial it says clearly minimum 12 months also 1st applicant criminal charge of simple possession from 15 years ago applied February 8 2025 that’s it simple case no other criminal history before or after

@Jack tripper

If you are 367 days since your "Submitted to ARO" you might be getting a rejection letter, or maybe they are considering you for a September Letter.

What are your circumstances, I'll tell you which.

I know your a "first time applicant" , is it criminal? Or overstay/misrepresentation? Better you know whats coming.

The timelines are VERY important, BUT, there are always waivers that are slower. But there is a reason in most cases. For example your country of birth can also be a factor.

As for timelines, they are a guide. For example, Michael Jordan is 6'6". Therefore all men must be that tall? No. He is an exception.