TIMELINES FOR WAIVERS ONLY.

J Rogersposted 1 year ago

Because MANY people log on here to see timelines, not discussions, lets keep THIS thread ONLY for timelines. Then people don;t have to sift through to find out how long they are taking. I was trying to amend the old one but it got deleted, so I saved the last page, and added a bit to it. My apologies if you were looking for old info. The page was getting spammed all the time and had a lot of comments on it.

[ J Rogers appended this reply on September 18, 2025 @ 4:02 pm ]

As for the timeline......when the fees went up the backlog slowed these applications down. That backlog is GONE. They could get every application they have done by Thanksgiving if they want. They do NOT want then done quickly. If this seems like "why would they do that?" then you aren't paying attention. Notice Canada has tariffs for made up reasons, and we have been threatened by Annexation. Notice Russia has not a SINGLE TARIFF. Notice Trump met with Putin in Alaska and got embarrassed. And STILL his "friends" have tariffs and the Russians.....nothing.

[ J Rogers appended this reply on February 18, 2026 @ 2:14 pm ]

sorry everyone, my mistake, this is his FIRST waiver. Not a re-application.

Replies (recent first):

@J Rogers shut up you fool they are not on March

Dumbshit replied 6 months ago   #418

I should have mentioned,

The reason it is "interesting" is that even though he has had a waiver before, they STILL put him in with the "new applicants" because so many years had passed.

So when you leave a larger "gap" you get adjudicated on like a brand new waiver.

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #417

5 YEAR WAIVER

Interesting case
-Had a waiver before but it was granted in 2007
-The 2007 Waiver was a 2 year waiver
-1992 Theft Under

Note the the waiver was dated January 23 so it is from 3 days ago.
-They are up to the March 2025 Waivers (clients who went to the border in March 2025) but I do still have a couple of February's pending, so if you went to the border i February don't worry, you should get something any day now.

Status History (5)

01/23/2026, 10:00 AM : Status changed to Completed
03/03/2025, 02:00 PM : Status changed to Submitted to ARO
02/28/2025, 04:49 PM : Status changed to Paid
02/28/2025, 04:48 PM : Status changed to Signed
02/26/2025, 04:18 PM : Application Created

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #416

@J Rogers shut up u fool this means nothing

J ROGERS THE MIDGIT replied 6 months ago   #415

@J Rogers YOU 5 foot tall midget how many times do you need to hear I don’t know that guy fuck him and fuck you how about that if he was my friend why would I say that u bitch u have me wrong advice that’s why I came at you I don’t know who both of u goofballs are nor do I care now stop calling me a random black bald guy cus I have u my number u pussy bitch I’m tired of your shit YOU DONT KNOW ANYTHINF YOU CANT GET LEGAL ADVICE THIS MORON HAS A UGLY WIFE WHO DOES FINGERPRINTS HE GOES OFD THOSE TIMELINES AND ACTS KIKE HE KNOWS SOMETHING IM SICK AND TIRED OF PEOLLE RELying on your stupidity

J ROGERS THE MIDGIT replied 6 months ago   #414

5 YEAR WAIVER.

Re-application. This is her third Waiver.

1986 Theft Under

Note it was granted 10 days ago, not today.

Status History (5)
01/16/2026, 09:33 AM : Status changed to Completed
10/22/2025, 06:20 PM : Status changed to Submitted to ARO
10/01/2025, 04:19 PM : Status changed to Paid
10/01/2025, 04:16 PM : Status changed to Signed
09/30/2025, 04:00 PM : Application Created

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #413

@J Rogers now I’m for sure not gonna stop u cunt

[ Jack rogers is a fag appended this reply on January 26, 2026 @ 10:26 am ]

Nobody here gives 2 shits about u u dumbass

Jack rogers is a fag replied 6 months ago   #412

@J Rogers I’m not gonna stop u bitch keep thinkin I’m some bald guys friend you stupid faggot fuck ur nobody and can’t give advice now shut the fuck u midgit bitch

Jack rogers is a fag replied 6 months ago   #411

I got a phone call and YES, everyone, this is Ken Scotts friend. Ken is a little bitter than no one is interested in his services, so he is trying to get his friend to make the Forum unusable.

Ignore him, he will go away in time. I'll post a reminder in a few months when Ken Scott tries to post some obscure fact to get attention. In the meantime, he has a Facebook Page about Waivers (he won;t let me access it) so feel free to leave your thoughts there.

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #410

@J Rogers u don’t know shit shut up and stop telling your wife’s fingerprinting details lol u can’t give no advice on shit

Fuck u faggot replied 6 months ago   #409

@willbill u shut the fuck up u dick sucker he ain’t a lawyer got his dunbasa exposed

Fuck u faggot replied 6 months ago   #408

Why do these guys keep spreading so much HATE??
Please, Roger is a nice guy doing his job
Appreciate all the work you do

willbill replied 6 months ago   #407

@J Rogers shut up bitch lol

Jack back again replied 6 months ago   #406

5 year waiver

Re-application Had a 5 year before this.

1997 Theft over

Status History (5)
01/23/2026, 07:06 AM : Status changed to Completed
10/21/2025, 06:38 PM : Status changed to Submitted to ARO
10/08/2025, 03:58 PM : Status changed to Paid
10/08/2025, 03:56 PM : Status changed to Signed
10/02/2025, 11:37 AM : Application Created

So there is no confusion, he is the "faster line" because he is a reapplication. Anyone who is waiting for their first Waiver, they are now working on February 2025. That is the slower line.

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #405

@K Scott

This is CLEARLY your friend or you, trolling the forum. He uses many different accounts and uses the same language from before, when you pulled the same childish antics.
The insults are recycled from before, so its obvious. People come here to get information, and your childish behaviour just disqualifies you from giving actual advice, not to mention no one is going to hire you when they see this. Worse, your posts prove that you have no interest in even giving a different opinion, and that you cannot be trusted. Your friend was dumb enough to even describe you, after claiming "I don't even know who this is".

If you want to be taken seriously, then behave like a professional.

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #404

John,

For the record, I am based in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. Not England.

I am not anonymous, I do not operate under aliases, and I do not engage in speculation. My professional background includes direct exposure to government systems, adjudicative decision-making environments, and years of hands-on experience analyzing U.S. immigration waiver outcomes. I operate publicly, including through long-form educational content where my analysis, methodology, and conclusions are open to scrutiny.
That is who I am.

This forum exists to exchange accurate information, experience, and insight related to waiver processes. It is not a venue for conjecture, identity speculation, or personal attacks. Applicants come here because they are navigating a stressful and opaque government process and are seeking clarity, not noise.

You and I operate at very different levels of knowledge, resources, and responsibility.
My work involves complex cases with serious criminal histories and layered U.S. immigration violations, supported by extensive case exposure, primary-source material, institutional knowledge, and direct engagement with the realities of adjudication. Your contributions rely largely on forum averages, assumptions, and anecdotal interpretation. That distinction explains the difference in both substance and tone.

I am not here to trade insults, debate personalities, or engage in provocation. Professionals with real responsibility for outcomes do not operate that way, because misinformation has real consequences for applicants.

For the benefit of readers, DHS does not operate under a mandatory timeline to adjudicate waiver applications. Decisions are rendered at the agency’s discretion when a case is ready. This has been substantiated during my interview with the former director of the ARO in January 2026. Suggesting otherwise creates false expectations and misleads people who are already under significant stress.

I do not rely on this forum. I participate selectively to correct misinformation and contribute at my discretion and convenience.

Ken Scott
Senior U.S. Immigration Law Intelligence Analyst
Complex Inadmissibility & Discretionary Waiver Analysis
Operating across Canada and Europe
Public analysis available: https://www.youtube.com/@Us-entry-waiver
www.usentrywaiverservices.com
Professional correspondence only
Cell: 604 562-8140
Office: 888 908-3841

K Scott replied 6 months ago   #403

@J Rogers REMINDER TO ALL THIS IS NOT A LAWYER HE CANNOT GIVE U REAL ADVICE HIS WIFE OWNS A FINGERPRINTING SHOP HES A NOBODY I DID MY GOOGLES ON HIN HE GOT BITCHY lol and thinks I’m some other black bald guy lol when Google tells u everything this guy is a complete and utter moron he’ll tell you your about to get denied then in same sentence he promises dates ARO doesn’t know this fool as I’ve asked in emails TRUST NE WHEN I TELL U he has NO LEGAL RIGHT TO TELL U ANYTHING this guy is a complete GOOBER tell him to provide any legal proof of anything he says he can’t he even replies to himself to make it look like he’s doing something this man is a fool please don’t beleive a word he says he knows no more then chat gpt j rogers ur a 5’7 cornball im done with you keep thinkin im some bald black guy u idiot lol

J rogers not lawyer replied 6 months ago   #402

@J Rogers you can’t do shit bitch shut up lo L now in this persons friend ur a goof u can’t do shit I’m here delete it I’ll come back :)

Rogers is a bitch replied 6 months ago   #401

Its one of Ken Scotts buddies. The one who pretends to be a "lifer" when he had his radio show. He does have a real criminal record, but my understanding is its "voyeurism" and he just had probation. He poses as some "ex gang guy" to pretend Ken Scott got him a waiver. One of the people from the forum texted me to explain who it is. Ken is very upset at my posts that point out his shortcomings, so his friend has decided to try and "wreck" the forum so no one uses it.

Ken, this isn't helping you.

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #400

Is everyone in agreement this guy needs to be banned? His number simply comes up:

Provider: Cellco Partnership DBA Verizon Wireless
Usage: Unknown
Country: US

So its an American number, but he doesn't pick up.

Suggestions if he doesn't leave? I don't want to restrict someone, but he is wasting everyone's time, and creating multiple identities.

J Rogers replied 6 months ago   #399

Reply to this thread

There is no need to “register”, just enter the same name + password of your choice every time.

Pro tip: Use to add links, quotes and more.