@Blue

Anything is possible. But to me, that is an indictable offence, yes old, and somehow the court documents would have to say enough information to suggest you borrowed a car. That being said, they could have made it a simple mischief or dropped it to theft under...and they didn't.

I am just telling you how Homeland Security is reading the situation, just like I did. Remember, I have shoplifters who didn't get September Letters. But I also have a guy waving a gun in a club who did. So suspend logic sometimes when considering the United States.

Moral turpitude and a theft offense must involve the intent to permanently deprive a person of his or her property. That’s not what occurred in my case. Wondering if this twist changes things.
Also, I’ve never had any interaction with the law since this charge.

I saw a law suit the successfully argued theft of a vehicle (which is what my conviction was for) wasn’t Moral Perpetude because the intent wasn’t permanent. Same situation as my conviction. I just borrowed the car without the owners knowledge. I did bring it back and was charged. Does this changes anything?

@Blue

Its a waiver. No September Letter for that. 5 year waiver if done properly. If you do it yourself, make sure you do a good job on the personal letter showing contrition.